W2 Issues/Concerns


Blog

Check out our weekly blog posts and see the latest news and discussions happening in the HR world of business.

Court Rules That it IS Legal to Pay a Woman Less Than a Man

A federal appeals court recently ruled that employers can legally pay women less than men for the same work based on differences in previous salaries. Previously, a number of court cases have ruled that putting too much emphasis on past salaries marks a violation of the Equal Pay Act (EPA), so the latest verdict marks a significant turn-around.

In the case, math consultant Aileen Rizo became aware that a recently hired math consultant was brought on at a higher salary than she was, and subsequently learned that other math consultants were also drawing larger paychecks. When she complained to her employer, which in this case was the superintendent of schools for Fresno County in California, she was told that salaries were based on “standard operating procedures” that called for workers to be paid based on their most recent salary plus five percent.

As part of the lawsuit, it emerged that the county established this standard operating procedure for salaries because it was objective; it encouraged candidates to work for the county in that it offered a five-percent increase over prior pay; it prevented favoritism and encouraged consistency; and it was a ‘judicious use of taxpayer dollars.’

The county tried to get the lawsuit dismissed based on the fact that even though prior pay played a rule in Rizo’s salary, the pay differential was based on a “factor other than sex,” and therefore protected it from EPA scrutiny. However, a district court refused to dismiss the case, noting that under the EPA, prior pay alone can never qualify as a factor other than sex.

However, an appeals court disagreed with this interpretation with the law, with a three-judge panel ruling that employers could use previous salary info if they applied it reasonably and had a business policy to back up the decision.

Still, employers probably shouldn’t get too excited about this ruling. First, it’s just one in a whole sea of rulings on the EPA rules – and one of the few that is offering protections. Further, a number of states specifically have laws that prohibit employers from relying on salary history, and there are several bills being considered that could prohibit employers from asking about your previous pay check all together.

With this in mind, HR Morning suggests that this case serves as a reminder to review your current pay practices to ensure that there are not any discrepancies between the way the salary for men and women in similar positions are configured. If there aren’t any concrete explanations for why there is a difference – and they can’t be defended with solid documentation – then you should take the time to bring them into compliance with EPA standards.

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HR Managers: Discover how to effectively tackle business challenges with a PEO
Small Business: Discover how Abel HR can help your business.

Featured BLOGS

  • Your Employees are the People in the Neighborhood

    Giving back to the community is an important aspect of being a business owner. In addition to encouraging your employees to support local causes, you can also give back in a significant way by supporting your employees who volunteer in the area, such as volunteer firefighters, first aid squad members and others. Did you know that having these employees as part of your business can actually boost your bottom line (and contribute to a more pleasant work environment)? Supporting employees who choose to volunteer can also make you a more attractive employer, opening your business up to a better caliber

  • How is the Cannabis Landscape Affecting HR?

    Thirty-three states and the District of Columbia have taken steps to decriminalize the use of marijuana. While 10 states—Alaska, California, Colorado, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Nevada, Oregon, Vermont and Washington—and our nation’s capital have adopted laws legalizing recreational cannabis use, the other states have only loosened the laws to allow for the use of medicinal marijuana (see where your state stands on this interactive map). It should be noted, however, that marijuana use—even for medical purposes—remains illegal at the federal level (and federal laws trump state laws…more on that in a minute). While the data is a bit murky in terms

Archives

FSA | Commuter New Employee Abel Portal Time Clock